<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.9" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday&#8217;s Selloff: Cause or Effect?</title>
	<link>http://www.thestockbandit.net/2007/02/28/cause-or-effect/</link>
	<description>Trading blog with trading insights, discussion on swing trading, day trading, and trading psychology.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.9</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Sluggish Breakouts Can&#8217;t Be Trusted &#124; TheStockBandit.net</title>
		<link>http://www.thestockbandit.net/2007/02/28/cause-or-effect/#comment-29868</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 12:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thestockbandit.net/2007/02/28/cause-or-effect/#comment-29868</guid>
					<description>[...] I&#8217;ve talked before about gauging the character of how a stock moves, and that certainly holds true on breakout plays. Ignoring things like weak volume on a breakout, late-day selling to come down from the highs, or simply the way a stock might clear resistance and yawn, are all ways to deny an underlying lack of strength which should really be monitored closely. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;ve talked before about gauging the character of how a stock moves, and that certainly holds true on breakout plays. Ignoring things like weak volume on a breakout, late-day selling to come down from the highs, or simply the way a stock might clear resistance and yawn, are all ways to deny an underlying lack of strength which should really be monitored closely. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
