<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I&#8217;m Not Trading AAPL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thestockbandit.net/2009/10/19/why-im-not-trading-aapl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thestockbandit.net/2009/10/19/why-im-not-trading-aapl/</link>
	<description>Trading blog for day trading, swing trading, and trading psychology</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheStockBandit</title>
		<link>http://www.thestockbandit.net/2009/10/19/why-im-not-trading-aapl/comment-page-1/#comment-146242</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStockBandit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestockbandit.net/?p=1662#comment-146242</guid>
		<description>Hey Simon,

Thanks for stopping by.  Good question, btw.

No a non-low ATR is not a prerequisite for a trade, I'm simply making the point that far less capital could be utilized for similar movement elsewhere.  What I'm saying is that I don't see the point of committing money to AAPL for the limited (relative) movement it offers, that's all.

ATR is not something I'll base my trades off of, but it is a gauge I will look to on occasion when it seems a stock doesn't move very much.  Lately, AAPL in the high $180's has offered very little movement for a stock of that price, which ATR visually depicts quite well.

It used to move nearly 4x as much and was at 1/2 it's current price, so that was far more bang for the buck than it has offered in recent months.  Once that changes, it'll be a better trading candidate.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Simon,</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by.  Good question, btw.</p>
<p>No a non-low ATR is not a prerequisite for a trade, I&#8217;m simply making the point that far less capital could be utilized for similar movement elsewhere.  What I&#8217;m saying is that I don&#8217;t see the point of committing money to AAPL for the limited (relative) movement it offers, that&#8217;s all.</p>
<p>ATR is not something I&#8217;ll base my trades off of, but it is a gauge I will look to on occasion when it seems a stock doesn&#8217;t move very much.  Lately, AAPL in the high $180&#8217;s has offered very little movement for a stock of that price, which ATR visually depicts quite well.</p>
<p>It used to move nearly 4x as much and was at 1/2 it&#8217;s current price, so that was far more bang for the buck than it has offered in recent months.  Once that changes, it&#8217;ll be a better trading candidate.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.thestockbandit.net/2009/10/19/why-im-not-trading-aapl/comment-page-1/#comment-146241</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestockbandit.net/?p=1662#comment-146241</guid>
		<description>is a non-low ATR a prerequisite for any trade you buy? i never put much emphasis on it. can you make a video explaining the significance of ATR and whether its best to buy on a high ATR or just a rising ATR...thanks jeff...love the site...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is a non-low ATR a prerequisite for any trade you buy? i never put much emphasis on it. can you make a video explaining the significance of ATR and whether its best to buy on a high ATR or just a rising ATR&#8230;thanks jeff&#8230;love the site&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
